Quisque sed purus consequat, gravida velit eu, pharetra ex.
crap. there is a debate tonight, isn’t there. ugh.
|8:07 PM||who am i. why am i here? no, really. why *am* i here?|
|8:59 PM||blah, blah, red states. blah, blah, undecided voters. blah, blah, obama, blah, blah, ohio, blah. blah, blah, debates don’t matter. blah, blah.|
|9:01 PM||if tom brokaw is approving the questions, why doesn’t he just ask them? i hate the townhall format. does that make me an elitist?|
|9:02 PM||i think we need to reevaluate making me a despot. i promise to be benevolent.|
|9:08 PM||mccain looks like a compassionate human being. what is he up to?|
|9:14 PM||oh, man! naked gun 2 1/2 is on. what am i doing with my life?!?|
|9:16 PM||obama isn’t looking good pointing so many fingers. just ignore mccain, and talk about a PLAN.|
|9:18 PM||NO ONE OUTSIDE OF THE BELTWAY THINKS THAT WRITING A LETTER IS DOING ANYTHING AT ALL. DROP IT.|
|9:23 PM||i hate this format. now instead of not answering the media’s questions (which we all agree is perfectly acceptable) they are now ignoring the questions of the general public. how is this good thing?|
|9:25 PM||mccain is going to cut entitlements and build a bunch of nuclear plants. i’m guessing he isn’t trying to turn dems to his cause …|
|9:26 PM||good for Obama knowing the price of gas in Nashville. nice touch.|
|9:30 PM||mccain is really spending a LOT of time talking about his record. are there that many who are unsure about it? if the are unsure about it, are they going to take his word at face value? i’m guessing not.|
|9:30 PM||“we’re not rifle shots here.” what exactly does this mean?|
|9:38 PM||CNN: the little audience response graph at the bottom of the screen *flatlined* on mccains crack that keeping track of obama’s tax plans are like nailing jello to the wall.|
|9:42 PM||social security reform isn’t tough, why hasn’t it been done yet, John?|
|9:45 PM||i’m thinking john’s record on climate change is a little suspect if his veep isn’t even sure global warming is caused by human beings. speaking of, i wonder if she falls into the “caused by cow flatulence” camp.|
|9:49 PM||don’t do it, obama. don’t go negative on mccain. we expect it from him, not from you.|
|9:51 PM||i have to look up that “politicians haven’t done anything in 30 years about energy, and mccain has been there for 26 of them” comment. if you *have* to go negative, that’s the way to go. let people draw their own conclusions. lead the horses to water, and most of us will drink.|
|9:58 PM||health care as a right for every american. god bless that man. god bless him.|
|10:02 PM||john mccain’s response to when to use military might is the best he has ever given … right up until that patronizing part at the very end.|
|10:03 PM||either i’m drunk or these things are getting easier to sit through. wait a second, i am drunk. nevermind.|
|10:07 PM||CNN has these analyst score cards … and i added up all six results for both candidates — Obama, 60. McCain, 11. Youch.|
|10:09 PM||I’m so tired of McCain’s hero-worship of Petraeus and Reagan. Why does he feel he needs to do it, and what would the analogy be for Obama. Clinton? Kennedy? LBJ?|
|10:12 PM||Hey, McCain’s got a new hero!!! It’s Teddy Roosevelt, now. Maybe he will shut up about Petraeus. (Or maybe not…)|
|10:19 PM||McCain’s negative comments flatlining on the audience response graph reminds the missus of McCain’s heart flatlining, which reminds her that he’s old, which makes her sad.|
|10:21 PM||gawd, he really is old.|
|10:22 PM||crap, Obama forgot his lines about Russia. slow and steady, my friend. noun first, then try a verb, then maybe an object … nice and slow.|
|10:27 PM||i am soooo tired of the “pre-conditions before talking to iran” issue. even if you are right, it’s not a campaign issue. NEXT SLIDE, please.|
|10:29 PM||stupid question! iran will not attack israel, and (if they did) china and russia would never oppose a response. the entire question is non-sensical. not to mention, isreal would beat the bejeeebus out of iran, so there would be no need to respond by the time we could muster the troops.|
|10:31 PM||question from new hampshire: “what don’t you know and how will you learn it?” damn hippies. wiskey-tango-foxtrot?|
|10:32 PM||wrap it up kids, i’m done.|
|10:34 PM||there is such a generational gap between the two candidates, and it shows in every single word, look and response.|
|10:35 PM||Final score from CNN — McCain, 29. Obama, 69.|
|10:37 PM||the disdain between the two candidates is actually pretty sad, especially considering they have both run a (relatively) clean campaign … at least when compared to the last two elections.|
|10:56 PM||three debates down, one to go. i hope i’m out of town for that one. maybe i should start planning a trip …|
The generational gap was more apparent tonight that it ever was before … and i’m guessing it was due to the absence of the podiums. McCain looked old, and the more he looks old, i think the more the rank and file Americans (who aren’t beguiled by Palin’s neocon-ly charms) bail on his campaign.
I’m glad the onslaught of personal attacks didn’t come … i think slinging mud would hurt both sides more than they’d help, because it causes the middle to stay home. We’ve had enough elections in recent memory that were about mobilizing the base, and that doesn’t help the national discourse by any means.
Yet again, I don’t there was anything here to change the conversation, and status quo favors the guy in the lead. My main concern is as it was after the very first one … Obama needs to start building up a lead, because once the white people are in the voting booth alone, all polls and predictions become bogus.
update: i just heard cnn’s republican and democratic analysts hand the election to obama (pending major implosion, etc). basically, the argument was that the things that mccain would need to do to take the lead are either too late (policy shift, separation from bush) or have too high a potential to backfire (personal attacks).
other interesting tidbit … in the initial poll, 50%+ thought that obama won (not news) but mccain’s unfavorable ratings are at 46%, while barack’s fell to 34% after the debate. if mccain is really 12% behind in unfavorables, there is no way he wins … you just can’t overcome a gap like that.