-
wedding reception
See All the Photos on Flickr:
nadine and nadav’s wedding reception, mercury hall, austin, texas -
snowpacolypse
DC is under 18 inches of snow, but the weather for us has been delightful … its 60 degrees and sunny in Austin, and Sparklet and I spent the day wandering around Zilker Botanical Garden and the Lake Austin waterfront.of course, it takes “two” airports to “tango” us home … so, we probably won’t make it back to DC before March. our flight for Sunday has already been canceled, and we’re guessing our new flight for Wednesday will be called off in the face of yet another snowstorm facing DC.
for the record, i can think of MUCH worse places to be “stranded” than Austin, Texas.
-
miracle baby
baby sparklet slept until 10am this morning, which isn’t exactly news …… except that at 10am we were taxi-ing down the runway on a flight to Austin, Texas.
that means she slept through (1) getting dressed at 6am, (2) loading the car and unloading at airport parking, (3) boarding and offloading the airport shuttle, (4) being taken out of her car seat and passing through security, (5) preboarding the aircraft, and (6) the aircraft pushing away from the gate.
actually, it wasn’t until the safety briefing ($@&#% volume-deaf stewardesses) that she finally decided to open her eyes and wonder what the heck was going on.
speaking of, I wonder if she is going to develop a complex about sleeping … it seems like each time she wakes she has a reasonable chance of being in completely different place than when she went down (museum, park, airplane, etc).
back to the miracle … due to her sleeping so well we didn’t have to start her feeding until after “wheels up,” which means we sidestepped the whole ear-pain/pressure thing and we’re halfway through the flight with nothing louder than a gurgle.
in semi-related news, we’re on the way to aunt nadine’s wedding to soon-to-be uncle nadav.
I started packing sparklet at about 10am yesterday, and by 2pm we were we were running to Target to buy the biggest suitcase they had in stock.
even so, we still look like we’re on a month-long trek through Nepal, and without the benefit of a legion of Sherpas.
we’ve got the new suitcase (packed exactly to the 50 lbs. limit), a roll-y bag complete with bridesmaid dress and approximately 237 diapers, a bag full of enough pumping equipment to empty the panama canal, the diaper bad, a car seat and a stroller.
next time, I’m getting a C-130 cargo plane to “advance” (pre-stage?) our trip.
now, normally, I’d bring a laptop to blog/upload photos over the weekend … but my back started weeping at the thought of another 15 lbs bag.
unfortunately, that means I’ll be blogging/uploading baby pics via the iPhone and its 36-dropped-calls-in-one-day, who-cares-about-3g-if-you-can’t-get-reception network brought to you by AT&T.
I’m not sure I’d expect another update before hell freezes over, or Luke Wilson gets his self-respect back … which ever comes first.
UPDATE: we landed, in heavy turbulance. still not a peep. it’s hard to refrain from being cocky … but I persevere, mostly so I don’t jinx us for the return.
See all the Photos on Flickr:
baby’s first flight
![[]](https://theparkerfamily.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/4339249958_874548fb18.jpg)
![[]](https://theparkerfamily.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/4339378960_3849a26481.jpg)
![[]](https://theparkerfamily.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/4338626021_f183368cd4.jpg)
![[]](https://theparkerfamily.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/4338594001_33709eaa95.jpg)
![[]](https://theparkerfamily.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/4339303264_d0b6a8dd7f.jpg)
![[]](https://theparkerfamily.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/4338538735_eeb8df0899.jpg)
![[]](https://theparkerfamily.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/4339264736_09401a6dba.jpg)
![[]](https://theparkerfamily.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/4326458602_74e62a7660.jpg)
“excuse me, but diaper bags are *not* permitted in the museum. please use one of the many lockers we have provided for your convenience.”
i have a half-dozen retorts in my mind — “if she spits up, can i borrow a 17th century masterwork?” or, “my convenience would be to keep the bag,” or, leaning over to sparklet and saying, “if you have any poo, fling it now” — but i decide to play along.
as i am walking to said lockers, he calls out after me: “and there is *certainly* no food or beverages allowed in the museum.”
now, i’m even more confused. i check my palms for frosty cold beer-verage. none. i look for a taco platter from taco cabana. nope.
when i make eye contact with he-who-shall-be-annoying, he is giving the stink eye to baby sparklet’s bottle of breast milk.
ah.
well, it’s a damn good thing that the lady sparkler wasn’t there, because she would have said “fine,” stripped off her shirt, and sparklet would have started breastfeeding right then and there.
and i would have *loved* to see him try and stop her.
now, at this point, i’m irritated, but not irate. i just know exactly what is going to happen (and they did, in turn):
sparklet poo’ed when we were the farthest we could have possibly been from their lockers. instead of ducking into another bathroom, i got to track a rather uncomfortable (and expressive!) baby through twelve galleries to retrieve the diaper bag.
then, sparklet wanted to eat, and, unlike every other museum we’ve visited, we didn’t have the option of her nursing while she stared intently at the paintings, or even us stopping every once on a bench for a couple ounces.
instead, she would cry for five minutes while we went back to the locker to feed, she would lose interest (remember, i’m feeding in a locker room here), we’d go back to the exhibit where we had left off, sparklet would remember that she wasn’t eating, and she would scream for five minutes while we went back to the locker.
rinse, and repeat.
now, through most of this, i was in a pretty okay mood with the blanton. it’s their collection, if they want to do it this way, then that’s completely their call.
what irritated the bejeezus out of me, was when i realized that a dozen other people were carrying bags around the museum that were *all* bigger than the diaper bag i was forced to lock up.
there were big dallas-housewife-sized shoulder bags, there were camera bags, there were satchels and laptop bags. a student even had a backpack stuffed with what looked like four years of science textbooks.
all of this, however, misses the point.
i guess it’s possible that i just ran into the one docent with an over-developed sense of enforcement, but if that’s not the case … then i am honestly embarrassed for the blanton.
this thick-headed, anti-family crap is what i would expect from a hoity-toity gallery in some uptight, old-monied art gallery in the northeast. it’s not what i would expect from texas, much less from austin, much less from UT.
and, truth be told, the up-tight art gallery in the northeast would just post a sign by the door saying “we ask that you do not bring children younger than five into the exhibit space” which, while also being honest about the gallery’s intent, also allows you to not waste your ticket money.
(when i asked guy-with-long-nose-to-stare-down about getting a refund on my admission based on my new understanding of his rules, he turned on his heels, lifted his nose, and said “enjoy your visit.”)
so, i won’t be going to the blanton again with sparklet … and while i wish it was a high-minded boycott, it actually comes down to their collection.
their masterworks are almost exclusively morose (highlights include two severed-john-the-baptist-heads, one saint agatha with a forced masectomy) and the modern exhibits relied too heavily on items from the looks-like-it-was-painted-by-a-three-year-old school.
blanton. if you are listening … much “bigger” museums seem to find ways to be family friendly. i hope you’ll figure out something, too.